It has been a while since we have commented on our lastest thoughts or happenings. I have been pretty busy working on a few other projects.
First, some changes we have made here at The Conservativist. Our old comments engine has been replaced. To help eliminate some comment spam and promote transparency, we have implemented Facebook’s commenting system. Secondly, I am moving anything that is not political over to my personal site. Only politics here from now on.
Also, my goal is to promote discussion, exchange ideas, and share opinions. Occasionally, we will do some investigative research and share some findings, but I want to change how this was working. I will continue posting press releases and the such as we have in the past. I’m glad to see our friends over at FITSNews picked up one of our popular trends.
Also, make sure you bookmark our events page. As the Presidential Primary season heats up, I will be updating this as often as possible. Use the contact form to get your event announced. Make sure you give us a decent notice to ensure your event gets posted in time.
Don’t forget to check out my other political news site, PoliticalVise.com. It’s a powerful news aggregator, only picking up blog political opinions, that is constantly growing. No opinions will be found there. Just news. We are constantly adding new blogs and states to the vise. So check it regularly.
Here are a few random thoughts and observations I have made over the past few months. Tell me what you think.
The Economy – Upstate, SC
Our elected officials can tout that we are business friendly and they support business etc all they want. But if you look at the job market in the Upstate, it does not appear to be as promising as they want you to believe.
Since the death of Mr. Milliken, Spartanburg politics has been in a spiral. The latest comes in the battle for the GSP Airport commission seats recently vacated, as mentioned in Jason Spencer’s recent blog.
From sources, we have learned that the jockeying is more so to keep one person off the commission as there is to getting on it. As it is, there have been four names submitted: Doug Cobb (current Spartanburg GOP Exec. Committeeman), Doug Smith (former SC House Speaker Pro Tem), Bill Barnett (former mayor of Spartanburg) and Elizabeth Carroll Belenchia (according to Google, an international real estate consultant).
Supposedly, a unnamed senator is lobbying to get Doug Smith on the board and keep Barnett off. Who does he want? Doug Cobb. This is supposedly about a power struggle between Smith and Barnett. And according to sources, this is almost a done deal.
I have seen this coming for some time now. Starting immediately with the formation of the Piedmont Republican Club after being defeated in April of 2009. Beltram has been linked to running for Spartanburg Country GOP Chair and SCGOP Chair. Although nothing has been made official. Not only that, he has started his own blog claiming transparency and no ads, eliminating an obligation to candidates, officials etc. I know Beltram well enough not to believe everything he writes or says…
Spartanburg Legislative Delegation Chairman
Sources have indicated that Representative Steve Parker (HD37) is working hard to become the next chairman of the Spartanburg delegation. A deal brokered in 2009 after a contest over rules and weighted voting resulted in the county delegation chairmanship alternating between the Senate and the House.
So, we’ve known for about a month or so that Karen Floyd would not be returning as SCGOP Chair in 2011. The front runners appear to be Patrick Haddon (Greenville County Chairman, SCGOP 1st Vice Chair) and Chad Connelly (Newberry County Chairman, Political Consultant). Rumors are abound that there is a potential third candidate. None of my sources have been willing to say any names for sure though.
As for me, I know Patrick personally and I have met Chad a few times. I know people close to Chad. I haven’t talked to them about their plans for the SCGOP and I’m not sure which way I will go.
The End of an Era – Per Say
Congressman Trey Gowdy was sworn into office on January 5, 2011, officially ending the era of former Congressman Bob Inglis. Inglis has been unrelenting on his criticism of the American people since his defeat in June 2010. He didn’t waste any time chiming in on the tragic events in Tuscon, making sure to place blame on conservatives nationwide. But this has been his call sign since he lost in June. Inglis fails to realize that he wasn’t ousted because he didn’t call Obama a socialist. Mr. Inglis’ votes and arrogance over several years led to his defeat.
Congressman Bob Inglis graced the airwaves of Comedy Central last night, visiting with Stephen Colbert (again), this time, he managed to get an endorsement.
Gowdy on the other hand, well, you’ll have to watch and see.
I’m disappointed though in Colbert’s endorsement. Apparently Colbert hasn’t visited The Conservativist to see how Inglis is predisposed to a government proposed healthcare solution, afraid of drilling, supporter of the Patriot Act extension and unfunded government mandates like the REAL ID.
Lastly, this is not an endorsement of either candidate.
|The Colbert Report||Mon – Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c|
|South Carolina’s 4th District Primary – Bob Inglis|
Lord is seeking the Republican nomination for SC Attorney General in next Tuesday’s primary runoff against Alan Wilson, son of Joe Wilson. Lord played a pivotal role in bringing Boeing to SC, which he caught some flak for earlier in the campaign as well.
Lord has had a very successful career as an attorney and was elected to be Nexsen Pruet’s chairman of the board in November 2005 (source Nexsen Pruet.com).
But late last week, we received an anonymous tip that we should look into Leighton Lord’s past financial contributions to political candidates.
Lo and behold, the candidate seeking the GOP nomination for Attorney General had made a few contributions to candidates on the other side of the isle, in particular Democratic Gubernatorial nominee Vincent Sheheen. The other donation in question was made to Dwayne Green, who was running against former Democratic Gubernatorial candidate Sen. Robert Ford.
Leighton Lord III Donation To:
Vincent Sheheen (State Senate – D), 3/30/2009, $250
Leighton Lord III Donation To:
Dwayne Green (State Senate – D), 2/26/2008, $200
Since Lord is the managing partner and chairman of the board of Nexsen Pruet, we figured he may have some role in how they donate monies to candidates in the elections. So below you will find those contributions too.
Nexsen Pruet Donation To:
SC Democatic Party, 5/19/2008, $2500
Nexsen Pruet Donation To:
Gilda Cobb-Hunter, 6/7/2008, $250
Nexsen Pruet Donation To:
Darrell Jackson Sr, 6/11/2008, $1000
Nexsen Pruet Donation To:
James E Smith, 12/15/2008, $1000
Nexsen Pruet Donation To:
Senate Democratic Caucus, 2/29/2008, $1000
Nexsen Pruet Donation To:
Senate Democratic Caucus, 8/12/2009, $1000
To be extremely fair, the company has made several larger contributions to republicans during those cycles as did Lord make similar contributions to republican candidates.
This raises some further concern, considering the beating Bob Inglis has given Trey Gowdy for his financial contributions to former Senator Fritz Hollings.
Inglis has been able to successfully question Gowdy’s conservativism and has drawed enough questions into that race.
So, Mr. Lord, how do you explain your donations to democratic candidates?
We have requested comment from the campaign which has not been returned as of publishing.
Back in the summer of 2008, I began looking intently to June 8th 2010. I was tired of Inglis’ politics and wanted change.
I began doing the research to see what it would take to mount a serious campaign against Inglis. This is no secret to the congressman, I had been one of his most vocal critics since 2007. Needless to say, during this research, I soon realized I didn’t have the resources at my disposal.
I was approached by members of Jeffrey’s (not Christina or family) camp in November 2008 and was asked to consider not running and backing her. I responded with a quick no. It was nothing personal against Jeffrey, I had many conversations with her and felt like she was a great person, but my gut said no.
During early months of 2009, I was able to interview most of the candidates and developed my personal opinions on who I liked in the race.
I decided that Andrew Smart was the way to go in April. He was young, intelligent, energetic and I liked his positions on the issues. Unfortunately, that didn’t work out quite like I had hoped.
So here’s my personal thoughts on each of the candidates.
The incumbent. My disagreement over policy has long been an issue. Unfortunatley, I began to discover that leadership was not a strong quality of Mr. Inglis either.
I say this because he spent tax payer money to research immigration, and develop his 5 points on immigration that he still talks about, but has never stepped up to he plate to introduce a bill. During many of his Let’s Talk forums, he gave the impression he supported amnesty, but was spared voting on it when it died in the Senate.
He claimed he was going to introduce an alternative health care bill, but never did. But he did introduce a “Repeal It” bill.
Inglis’ votes to limit the freedoms of individuals (He voted to extend the Patriot Act and warrantless wire tapping), unfunded mandates like the Real ID that was embedded into the Tsunami Aid Bill, TARP, and his energy policies which have created many questions in itself.
Again, it is nothing personal against Inglis, it is about his positions. I hope he and his team understand this.
I was honestly surprised to see Gowdy jump in this race, probably just as much as Inglis was. Most of our sources and rumors indicated that Gowdy would be making a run for Attorney General. Gowdy would have made an excellent AG and I probably would have supported him 100%.
Gowdy was one of the candidates we were never able to settle down on an interview. And it wasn’t his fault. I had consulted with the campaign and discussed opportunities, but I was never able to work it into my work schedule. My apologies to Gowdy up front and my readers.
All along, one of my concerns, drawbacks on Gowdy was his support of McCain in the 2008 primaries. I understand and respect Gowdy’s reasoning, but it was of concern. Gowdy is a prosecutor and I’m not sure how effective that will translate into working for votes in Congress.
Christina Jeffrey talks all the right points to attract a Tea Party activist or even a Ron Paul supporter. What bugged me through the election cycle is her mannerisms and the several lies she was caught in. The biggest of which was who she supported for President in 2008. In a debate, she said she voted for Duncan Hunter, and when questioned on it later, she stated she voted for Huckabee and even worked for Rudy Giuliani. A wild stretch considering her “most conservative” candidate monicker.
Jeffrey claims she not the political establishment and she’s different because she’s a constitutional scholar. She’s also been a community organizer by her own accounts, working on multiple campaigns with Get out the Vote efforts and working in the county party. Lastly, according to her profile, she’s never been in a position of authority. All of her experience is in the classroom teaching constitutional theory. She has not managed budgets or personnel. All of this sounds to much like our current president, Barack Obama, and most of us agree all of these supposed great attributes have failed horribly.
With all due respect to Sen. David Thomas, when he announced, I choked. His claims to be the conservative choice and a jobs congressman were all laughable. He then goes on to say that when elected, he will establish a commission with leaders across multiple states to determine a solution to the nations financial problems. I’m really rolling on the floor now, Why?
In the spring of 2009, Thomas and 4 other leaders held a press conference in Spartanburg telling people they were going to roll up their sleeves and fight the stimulus. Unfortunately, Thomas didn’t keep he sleeves up long, as he rolled over and voted to take all of it. Sources tell us he was even instrumental in getting votes to take the money.
And in regards to fixing the nations problems, what has he done to reduce the size of SC’s $21 billion dollar budget and not raise fees and taxes on its citizens?
When speaking with each of the candidate, Lee came across as the most candid. He also spent the most time with us, 3 hours in our interview, and he didn’t beat around the bush when answering questions. Jim has been very humble and appreciative of the support he has received and he doesn’t belittle his opponents or critics.
Jim is a supporter of the enumerated powers act and also provides a solution for the social security crisis. Jim supports the enforcing of our existing immigration laws to solve the illegal immigration crisis and believes the private sector can solve the health care crisis, developing a patient centered patient led system.
Jim has the experience of managing projects and budgets and has a history of working with teams to find the best solution. He can be influential too, which is also a great quality.
Jim is the only veteran, so he understands the needs of our servicemen, and he has the real world experience some of the others do not.
I voted absentee today, casting my vote for Jim Lee. I encourage you to do the same, voting for a candidate who will listen to his constituents and will not talk down to you. Voting for a candidate who has ran a clean campaign on the smallest budget. A campaign for “We the People”. A candidate who is candid and will fight for you in D.C.
One thing I have learned, the winners in this race are Brains on Fire and Creative Communications, who have taken in $235,493 and $170,000 respectively. They have pocketed some serious dough. Below is the last run down on the candidates financial situation and our weekend poll leading up to the primary on June 8th.
Donors: 55 itemized donors, 39 In District ($46,750.00)
PAC: 9 PAC ~$11,500
Cash on Hand: $139,600.81
COH Change: -$107,209.34
Bob’s campaign staff has been promoting Jim Lee over the past few weeks while tearing down everyone else in the race.
Either way, we find a few of the individual contributions a little strange. Inglis has taken in $4,800 Marshall Saunders and $4,800 from Pamela Saunders, both from Coronado, CA. Marshall’s occupation/employer is listed as the Citizens Climate Lobby. My understanding of federal election law states that the max contribution is $2400 per person.
Other expenses of note. Inglis paid the “National Right to Life” committee for campaign advertising (Your thoughts please?). Inglis’ marketing partners pocketed another $110K and his wife made another $4,000.
Donors: 123 itemized donors, 115 unique, 108 in district ($63,299.91)
Cash on Hand: $39,003.21
COH Change: -$149,723.92
WOW! This is the most surprising of all the campaigns thus far. In the last 45 days, Gowdy has spent all but $39,000 that he has taken in this election cycle. In total, he has spent close to $400,000. Of course, this does not differentiate him much from Inglis who has spent over $500,000 during this election cycle.
During this reporting period, Gowdy spent $146,956 with Creative Communications Inc on media placements. That is on top of the ~$23,000 he has spent previously with them (~$170,000). Another $41,113.50 was sent to his consulting firm, First Tuesday Strategies for polling, 2 or 3 commercial productions and consulting expenses.
I realize Gowdy is trying to win an election, just like everyone one else in this race, but to spend $217,000 in 45 days is insane.
Donors: 11 itemized donors, 9 Unique, 7 in-district ($6,400)
Cash on Hand: $7,984.79
COH Change: $1,086.96
Jeffrey’s campaign appears to be tanking. Her fundraising has been dismal. Biggest expenses were office rent ($2,000), mailings ($1,800) and another $550 to Upstate Printing & Publishing (Boiling Springs Tea Party).
Donors: 22 itemized donors, 22 unique, 21 in district ($10,410)
Cash on Hand: $4392.60
COH Change $2,352.95
Lee had better fund raising performances than Thomas and Jeffrey, but has managed to incur debt in the amount of $13,650. Jim’s largest expense is to Dark Horse Strategy Group who is responsible for all mailings, advertising and campaign materials, approximately $5,600.
Donors: 8 itemized donors, 6 unique, 2 in district ($4,300)
Cash on Hand: $39,101.04
COH Change: -$7,722.54
David Thomas must be pretty confident in his chances to win. He has loaned his campaign $43,000 since entering the race last summer. The most recent loan was in the amount of $40,000 on May 14. In other words, Thomas’ campaign was broke at the time of filing. Thomas has also spent $33,967 on television advertising between the major networks.