Who Did Jeffrey Support in 2008?
March 10, 2010 by Gary Coats
Filed under SC Politics
We were going to give Jeffrey a break for a little while and focus on our main issue, Bob Inglis, but this landed on our laps today and we feel the 4th Congressional District should know.
A commenter on a previous post brought this question “Who Did Jeffrey Support in 2008?”
Thanks to a private ballot, we will never know who Jeffrey truly pulled the lever for in 2008. But thanks to media outlets across the country, we know who all she claims to have supported.
For the last year, we have heard Jeffrey talk about her close relationship with Ron Paul. The way she has talked about him and her relationship would lead one to believe she was a fervent supporter. She has worked feverishly to gain the Campaign for Liberty support and has used this relationship to help solidify her status as the Tea Party candidate.
On November 17th, 2009, she told the Spartanburg Herald Journal’s Jason Spencer, well, wouldn’t tell him who she supported.
On March 5th, 2010 she claimed she supported Congressman Duncan Hunter in the 2008 Presidential Primary in the News Radio WORD debates. At 43:00 minutes into the debate, Bob McLain asks the telling question and at 44:50, Jeffrey responds. You can see her response here.
And the kicker is……
Today, we discover and article from April 24, 2007 in the Rocky Mountain Times, out of Denver, Colorado. What did Jeffrey have to say to Mike Littwin of the Rocky Mountain Times besides being “inbred like all South Carolinians”?
Read the excerpt below:
But Christina Jeffrey has found her candidate. She’s serious enough about Giuliani that she’s standing in the Dorman High School gym, pulling the tape from the back of “Rudy” posters and stacking them for the next event.
I’m trying to understand her devotion, other than the fact that she does freelance work for a public relations company employed by Giuliani.
She’s a South Carolina conservative who can trace her roots here to the 1600s. “We’re inbred like all South Carolinians,” she said, pulling away another piece of tape. “I did my duty by marrying an Iowan to improve the gene pool.”
She has five children. And her most important issue, she says, is abortion. And Giuliani’s stance is: He says he personally hates abortion, which is the default position for most pro-choice candidates.
“I want the United States of America to win the war against the terrorists,” Jeffrey said, explaining her support of Giuliani. “I think abortion is the No. 1 issue facing the people of America, but it’s not the No. 1 issue that a president can influence.”
Of course, Giuliani has problems other than abortion for social conservatives, and I’m not including the multi-marriage issue. When I point this out to Jeffrey, she points to a white-haired man in a suit. She says he’s a “famous” social conservative in the state who used to work on Wall Street when Giuliani was mayor.
“He tells me you have to march in the Gay Pride parade if you want to be elected in New York,” she said. “And it’s hard to get elected there if you’re pro-life.
“He says that Giuliani is not really pro-choice. He insists he’s not. I know Giuliani is a Catholic who was raised Catholic. Even if he is pro-choice, if he’s really pro-choice, at least he understands the argument.”
I tell her it’s all on the record. I can show her Giuliani saying government should pay for abortions for poor women. It’s as easy to find as YouTube. Isn’t she guilty, I ask, of wishful thinking?
“We want to win here in South Carolina,” she said. “We know math. We know how to add.”
She stops and laughs.
“I’m as capable of wishful thinking as anybody.”
Problems that don’t pass
Now I begin to understand. Obviously, many people now drawn to Giuliani – people like Jeffrey – don’t agree with him on basic issues. But it isn’t that they don’t know what he believes. It’s that they don’t want to know what he believes.
I know, I know, I know. Tell us what you think…..
UPDATE:
PoliticalNetTV has picked up on this story and has provided their insight on the situation.
Gowdy Leads, Lee Close Behind in Fountain Inn Straw Poll
March 9, 2010 by Gary Coats
Filed under SC Politics
Last night, the Fountain Inn Chamber of Commerce and Fountain Inn Rotary Club hosted a fourth congressional debate with Myra Ruiz from WYFF moderating. The results of the straw poll held after the debate are as follows (sections is in order of percent vote).
Trey Gowdy
Trey gathered 31% of the vote after the debate. This is not all surprising as he has been working hard and building a lot of name recognition. Of all the candidates, he has not been shy when it comes to attacking Inglis. Given his fund raising totals and the perceived street cred obtained by those numbers, he may be in the final two.
Jim Lee
As the title says, Lee came in second with 27%. This looks good for Jim and shows that his ground game and solid performance last week in the WORD radio debate is cashing in. If Jim can continue to build this momentum, watch out.
David Thomas
I have been hearing rumors that Thomas’ Senate seat may be on the line if he performs poorly in his own district. Unfortunately, for Thomas, polling in 3rd with 20% in his backyard could be the beginning of the end for him in politics.
Christina Jeffrey
Jeffrey brought in 15% after the Boiling Springs Tea Party issued a “Red Alert” call to action yesterday. She is polling a little better than I expected. We are waiting to see if the other Tea Parties will get behind her, but our sources say that is not likely.
Bob Inglis
Bob, Bob, Bob. What else can we say than he brought in 7% of the vote. Oh yeah, did we mention the democrats are likely not to vote in this election since they have multiple candidates in the governors race they covet so dearly?
You can read more at the Greenville News.
Bob Inglis Factoids
March 1, 2010 by Gary Coats
Filed under SC Politics

Congressman Bob Inglis, Republican SC-4
Congressman Bob Inglis has been touting his conservative votes and most of those were made since Obama was elected. We have been doing a little fact checking of our own and thought we would share/remind you about the not so conservative Bob Inglis. Once you finish, make sure you vote in our poll below.
National Debt & Spending
Since Inglis was sent back to Congress in 2004, the national debt has increased by 62% and spending increased by 42% in the same period. Facts from the Congressional Budget Office.
Inglis on Czars
In a mailer to Union County ahead of a Union GOP meeting, Inglis claimed he learned about the issues with czars from his citizens. I was at this meeting and Inglis was raked over the coals because he was justifying the use of czars because George H.W. Bush had czars in the early 90’s. It was when a bunch of liberty minded citizens that took him to task over their (czars) accountability, he changed his mind. I’m glad he did, but this is good for you to know.
Inglis on Health Care
Inglis claims he voted “no” to the Democrats health care bill. Have you heard his vision for health care? He wants the government to cover the first $2000 of your medical expenses every year. Then you will will pick up the next $2000 and the government will pick up the rest. So, lets say there are 275 million people in America, the minimum annual cost of his proposal is $550,000,000,000. $550 BILLION a year, minimum.
When asked how he proposes to pay for this, he says you will. How? Since there will be no more employer based health insurance, you will have an additional $1000 per month in your paycheck, approximately, that can be sent to Uncle Sam. That is if employers decide to give that money back to you in terms of salary. So, if we have 150 million people working and paying for health insurance now (this number is pure speculation), then $1.8 trillion ($1,800,000,000,000) would be going to the government in tax revenues, assuming you receive the additional $1000/month from your employer and turn it over to Uncle Sam.
We know our estimated minimum cost of $550 billion a year will be exceeded, but the question is by how much?
Many questions linger around this idea that Inglis has proposed and I am still waiting to see the bill he is preparing. It has been presented as a medicare replacement and a national health care plan, so only time will tell for us to see what will become of his proposal.
Inglis and the Real ID
Do you know how The Real ID Act came to be?
Originally H.R. 418, the Real ID, was approved by the House (and Inglis) in February 2005.
The original bill died, but one brave individual decided to attach it to another piece of legislation. Of all things to be attached to, it was attached to the Tsunami Aid bill in 2005 officially known as H.R. 1268 (Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Tsunami Relief, 2005) just 3 hours after the House voted in favor of H.R. 1268; 388-43. The provision went to the Senate without debate.
Inglis later voted in favor of the final version of the bill (H.R. 1268), including the Real ID Act of 2005.
It is argued that the Real ID is a massive intrusion into states rights and personal liberties. On top of that, the mandate appears to be unfunded and Inglis rejected his constituents and the people of South Carolina who have vehemently fought this bill and its repercussions. The SC State House signed a bill that barred SC from abiding by the provisions set forth by the Real ID Act of 2005 and Governor Sanford applied for exemption to the standards successfully.
This is another prime example of Inglis being disconnected from his constituents (TARP and Iraq Troop Surge are a few others).
Inglis and Hydrogen
One thing missing from the campaign trail recently…Hydrogen. Why? We can only assume it is because he is trying to cover his tracks and show this conservative side. Hell, for the last 4 years we have listened to Inglis speak, he has pimped Hydrogen like it was Maria Balen Chapur.
We have criticized him greatly for some of his stances and we respect the development of alternative fuels, but Inglis was unrelenting on climate change, global warming, and hydrogen. You can see some history of that in “The Greener Side of Inglis“.
Kelly Payne Relationship Revealed – What Does It Matter?
February 17, 2010 by Gary Coats
Filed under Opinion, SC Politics
Today, media outlets are reporting the sexually explicit emails of a relationship between Kelly Payne (candidate for Sup. Education) and Comptroller General Richard Eckstrom.
I for one am sick and tired of the media and public deeming the private lives of citizens, public or not, fair game. Lets be real people, what the hell does it matter that Kelly Payne and Richard Eckstrom had a relationship! Are we going to start announcing everyone’s affair to the mass public for us to oooh and ahhh over?
What is wrong with them expressing their sexual desires for each other?
How often do you share with your significant others your sexual desires via email or text message?
The person responsible for leaking these emails accomplished one thing and one thing only. They have potentially ruined the careers of these individuals. Payne’s teaching career will probably will come to a close because her private sexual messages were revealed to the public. She could have returned to teaching had she lost her bid to be Superintendent of Education. Now she will not be able to.
We don’t know what the repercussions for Eckstrom will be. We have heard rumors of candidates jumping into this race and they will probably hurry to it now this so called “scandal” has been revealed.
Politics aside, the individual who hacked her emails is officially a criminal and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Our advice, don’t forget to change your passwords!
Common Sense Grandma Alienates Tea Party
February 12, 2010 by Gary Coats
Filed under SC Politics
There has been much bru ha ha over the past few days concerning the attempted take over of the Tea Party by the SCGOP, the agreement that was reached, and Chairman Floyd’s TV News stops promoting the deal.
According to Americans Have Had Enough and the Upcountry Coalition of Conservative Organizations press release, the agreement reached with the SCGOP was different from what was communicated to the national media outlets. The terms of the original agreement can be found here. You’ll have to decipher that one.
In response to the Upcountry Coalition, the Common Sense Grandma1, Christina Jeffrey came out swinging at Russ Cassell, Roan Garcia-Quintana and others claiming they are republican haters to the same Tea Party leaders that support and rally around these individuals. Not a very smart move considering the voting base you are courting is that audience.
Guys, Roan Quintana, Kerry Wood, Russ Castle and Randy Simpson are GOP haters.
I think the guys above are agitating to beat the band and we should be careful. Not because I’m a candidate but because we will look bad as a movement if we beat people up unnecessarily. Listen to what she says – it’s just what Patrick said at the Greenville Exec Committee, not profound, not the way you or I would have said it, but not evil and not co-opting.
Even worse for Jeffrey, Cassell caught wind of this and aired her dirty laundry all over WORD (106.3) this morning. We are still waiting for the highlights to be posted on NewsRadioWord.com, we’ll provide a link when it becomes available. NewsRadioWord Audio Link.
Sources indicate it was not a pretty morning for Jeffrey. She was even referred to as “the nutty professor” a few times. Ouch!
In my opinion, the entire premise and support base she built for this primary was completely obliterated this morning by trying to defend Karen Floyd’s statements.
Although it may have been the right thing to do, this may have killed any hope for a primary victory for Jeffrey in June.
UPDATE:
Reporting in from Greenville, the abusive behavior of a particular candidate consistently running into people as an intimidation tactic as returned. It wouldn’t be so bad if you didn’t do it so often, repeatedly and inconsiderately. We now have reports of this from the March for Life, Andre Bauer’s Christmas Party, Wade’s, and now Tommy’s Ham House. You KNOW who you are!
UPDATE 2:
Jeffrey managed to squeeze her way to the front at the Press Conference today to get beside GOP Chairman Karen Floyd and wanted to speak. As soon as she tried to speak, the crowd shouted her down, told her they didn’t want to hear anything else from her. Supposedly, she yelled back before Kibler said let her talk. She issued an apology. In fairness, Quintana stated that since Jim Lee was in attendance, it was only fair he had an opportunity to speak to.
Bob Inglis
The Inglis campaign came out with a full frontal assault on Trey Gowdy this morning.
The Inglis campaign has filed ethical violations to the FEC and SC Ethics questioning Gowdy’s potential use of state campaign monies in his congressional race. This story was broke by Jason Spencer at the Herald Journal.
Also, Inglis has begun what has been termed a “blitzkrieg” in Union County over the last week. I’m not sure Union is used to having this much attention for the congressional race.
David Thomas
Thomas campaigns ads have begun to be aired during news broadcast in the upstate this week.
1 Common Sense Grandma was Jeffrey’s tag line for her 2008 election for SC House District 32



