<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jim Lee &#8211; Trunk or Treat!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theconservativist.com/2009/10/28/jim-lee-trunk-or-treat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theconservativist.com/2009/10/28/jim-lee-trunk-or-treat/</link>
	<description>The Upstate&#039;s Source for Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:42:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wedding</title>
		<link>http://theconservativist.com/2009/10/28/jim-lee-trunk-or-treat/comment-page-1/#comment-9227</link>
		<dc:creator>wedding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 05:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theconservativist.com/?p=2067#comment-9227</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vponsale.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wedding dresses&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rs2guru.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wedding invitations&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vponsale.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wedding gowns&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.vponsale.com/" rel="nofollow">wedding dresses</a><br />
<a href="http://www.rs2guru.com/" rel="nofollow">wedding invitations</a><br />
<a href="http://www.vponsale.com/" rel="nofollow">wedding gowns</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://theconservativist.com/2009/10/28/jim-lee-trunk-or-treat/comment-page-1/#comment-8731</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theconservativist.com/?p=2067#comment-8731</guid>
		<description>This looks like fun.  I think Jim Lee has been getting out there more to be visible with things like this than Thomas or Gowdy have.  I guess they are spending all their time raising money which many candidates use as an excuse for putting off the grassroots stuff.  I just hope Jim Lee is tapping into all the like-minded networks of activists in the Upstate for money, even though it will likely be small contributions.

What I&#039;d like to see from an insurgent candidate like Jim Lee is to really take the fight to Inglis--lay out everything in Inglis&#039; record since 2004 that parallels with the Democrats, go after him for talking down to all of us FOX News watching constituents, etc.  Maybe be a little more honest and direct with your rhetoric than Gowdy or Thomas might be (are they really going to hit Inglis hard??)

Some candidates recoil at the idea of running a negative campaign, but they really shouldn&#039;t.  Negative campaigns often work.  This election needs to be a referendum on Bob Inglis and Republican primary voters need to know exactly why they should view the June primary as a vote against Inglis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks like fun.  I think Jim Lee has been getting out there more to be visible with things like this than Thomas or Gowdy have.  I guess they are spending all their time raising money which many candidates use as an excuse for putting off the grassroots stuff.  I just hope Jim Lee is tapping into all the like-minded networks of activists in the Upstate for money, even though it will likely be small contributions.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;d like to see from an insurgent candidate like Jim Lee is to really take the fight to Inglis&#8211;lay out everything in Inglis&#8217; record since 2004 that parallels with the Democrats, go after him for talking down to all of us FOX News watching constituents, etc.  Maybe be a little more honest and direct with your rhetoric than Gowdy or Thomas might be (are they really going to hit Inglis hard??)</p>
<p>Some candidates recoil at the idea of running a negative campaign, but they really shouldn&#8217;t.  Negative campaigns often work.  This election needs to be a referendum on Bob Inglis and Republican primary voters need to know exactly why they should view the June primary as a vote against Inglis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Jansen</title>
		<link>http://theconservativist.com/2009/10/28/jim-lee-trunk-or-treat/comment-page-1/#comment-8730</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Jansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theconservativist.com/?p=2067#comment-8730</guid>
		<description>We need to get Jim Lee in a Stearman towing a banner. And have him go up and down Highway 9 at rush hour, waving. He&#039;s competing against Spartanburg&#039;s home grown version of Roland Freisler. And Roland, er, Trey has US $200K to spend on adverts saying what a pro-constitution pro-liberty guy he is. (Not).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stearman_Aircraft

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roland_Freisler

IMHO, Trey is same ole, same ole. Chump Change. Jim would be different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need to get Jim Lee in a Stearman towing a banner. And have him go up and down Highway 9 at rush hour, waving. He&#8217;s competing against Spartanburg&#8217;s home grown version of Roland Freisler. And Roland, er, Trey has US $200K to spend on adverts saying what a pro-constitution pro-liberty guy he is. (Not).</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stearman_Aircraft" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stearman_Aircraft</a></p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roland_Freisler" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roland_Freisler</a></p>
<p>IMHO, Trey is same ole, same ole. Chump Change. Jim would be different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

