<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lee Responds to Inglis&#8217; Vote to Reprimand Wilson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theconservativist.com/2009/09/16/lee-responds-to-inglis-vote/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theconservativist.com/2009/09/16/lee-responds-to-inglis-vote/</link>
	<description>The Upstate&#039;s Source for Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:42:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: true religion jeans</title>
		<link>http://theconservativist.com/2009/09/16/lee-responds-to-inglis-vote/comment-page-1/#comment-8979</link>
		<dc:creator>true religion jeans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theconservativist.com/?p=1952#comment-8979</guid>
		<description>I really can’t see why anyone is defending Wilson. It pained me not to vote for him because I felt like I was voting for the Democrat indirectly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really can’t see why anyone is defending Wilson. It pained me not to vote for him because I felt like I was voting for the Democrat indirectly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://theconservativist.com/2009/09/16/lee-responds-to-inglis-vote/comment-page-1/#comment-8528</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theconservativist.com/?p=1952#comment-8528</guid>
		<description>I really can&#039;t see why anyone is defending Wilson.  Getting a slap on the wrist from the house for acting like a moron during a presidential speech seems reasonable.

I wouldn&#039;t interrupt a complete stranger talking  at a podium at a PTA meeting... and this guy interupted the president of the united states giving a public address.  A slap with a newspaper and a &quot;Bad Dog!&quot; does not seem unreasonable to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really can&#8217;t see why anyone is defending Wilson.  Getting a slap on the wrist from the house for acting like a moron during a presidential speech seems reasonable.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t interrupt a complete stranger talking  at a podium at a PTA meeting&#8230; and this guy interupted the president of the united states giving a public address.  A slap with a newspaper and a &#8220;Bad Dog!&#8221; does not seem unreasonable to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://theconservativist.com/2009/09/16/lee-responds-to-inglis-vote/comment-page-1/#comment-8527</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theconservativist.com/?p=1952#comment-8527</guid>
		<description>Nobody is saying 1.7 million anymore.  It was always a bogus number.

Even the conservative news sites are saying 600,000.

The more moderate ones are saying 100-200,000.

The police and fire department in Washington are saying 60-75,000.


I do tend to go with the officials in washington.  People always get pissed off by their estimates (both liberal and conservative) because they&#039;re ALWAYS lower then what the people promoting the event want to say.

But most of the time they&#039;re viewed as the most accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody is saying 1.7 million anymore.  It was always a bogus number.</p>
<p>Even the conservative news sites are saying 600,000.</p>
<p>The more moderate ones are saying 100-200,000.</p>
<p>The police and fire department in Washington are saying 60-75,000.</p>
<p>I do tend to go with the officials in washington.  People always get pissed off by their estimates (both liberal and conservative) because they&#8217;re ALWAYS lower then what the people promoting the event want to say.</p>
<p>But most of the time they&#8217;re viewed as the most accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://theconservativist.com/2009/09/16/lee-responds-to-inglis-vote/comment-page-1/#comment-8476</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theconservativist.com/?p=1952#comment-8476</guid>
		<description>Sean exhibits the favorite tactic used by the liberal left and media. Rather than address the issue being discussed they pick out some superfluous detail that has nothing to do with the discussion, ala Jimmy Carter declaring that Joe Wilson&#039;s outburst was race-based. You&#039;ll note that little time is being spent on the actual issue Mr. Wilson pointed out and congress immediately set about correcting in there various bills to ensure some form of accountability or verification of eligibility for benefits. So, right or wrong in his outburst, Joe Wilson actually managed to further the discussion and cause at least 1 issue of concern to be fixed. In the end, that is what our elected officials are supposed to be doing...protecting America, in this case protecting our health care system from being fraudulently used by people who are not eligible (they can still get care in emergency rooms and free clinics, just not participate in the health program being considered in congress). 
You will note that I am not taking Sean&#039;s bate to discuss the number of Patriots at the TEA Party (I was there), Jim Lee&#039;s religious values (I know Jim personally unlike Sean), and the REAL reason for the TEA Party (everyone in attendance had their own personal reason for coming and many displayed their position with their signs, many of which were inspiring and imaginative...I loved the one with Obama dressed as Erkle (sp?) saying &quot;Did I do that?&quot; standing next to an economic chart showing declining trend). Don&#039;t take this guys bate folks. He, like his mentor, Mr. Obama, just want to derail the focus of the discussion. Stay on point and be dismissive of these fools just as they are trying hard to dismiss all of the Patriots turning out to be heard. Never argue with a fool, as the on-lookers may have a hard time deciding who is whom.

A Proud Conservative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean exhibits the favorite tactic used by the liberal left and media. Rather than address the issue being discussed they pick out some superfluous detail that has nothing to do with the discussion, ala Jimmy Carter declaring that Joe Wilson&#8217;s outburst was race-based. You&#8217;ll note that little time is being spent on the actual issue Mr. Wilson pointed out and congress immediately set about correcting in there various bills to ensure some form of accountability or verification of eligibility for benefits. So, right or wrong in his outburst, Joe Wilson actually managed to further the discussion and cause at least 1 issue of concern to be fixed. In the end, that is what our elected officials are supposed to be doing&#8230;protecting America, in this case protecting our health care system from being fraudulently used by people who are not eligible (they can still get care in emergency rooms and free clinics, just not participate in the health program being considered in congress).<br />
You will note that I am not taking Sean&#8217;s bate to discuss the number of Patriots at the TEA Party (I was there), Jim Lee&#8217;s religious values (I know Jim personally unlike Sean), and the REAL reason for the TEA Party (everyone in attendance had their own personal reason for coming and many displayed their position with their signs, many of which were inspiring and imaginative&#8230;I loved the one with Obama dressed as Erkle (sp?) saying &#8220;Did I do that?&#8221; standing next to an economic chart showing declining trend). Don&#8217;t take this guys bate folks. He, like his mentor, Mr. Obama, just want to derail the focus of the discussion. Stay on point and be dismissive of these fools just as they are trying hard to dismiss all of the Patriots turning out to be heard. Never argue with a fool, as the on-lookers may have a hard time deciding who is whom.</p>
<p>A Proud Conservative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patriot</title>
		<link>http://theconservativist.com/2009/09/16/lee-responds-to-inglis-vote/comment-page-1/#comment-8472</link>
		<dc:creator>Patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theconservativist.com/?p=1952#comment-8472</guid>
		<description>Sean, were you there?  If you were then you would realize the amount of people that showed up.  60-70000?  1.7 is definitely more like it.  It was an outstanding showing of Americans outraged at ridiculous government spending for things that gov&#039;t has no business being a part of.  The focus of the rally was the government as a whole, and who is at the center of it right pushing for government run health care?  Obama.   

The Republicans in office for the 8 years prior did an awful job as well, they increased spending by a stupid amount, and now we are at the breaking point to where we are operating off of funny money.  It is time to replace them all and put people back in who will do their job to serve the people.

Your response to this post is also ridiculous in the fact that you haven&#039;t posted a single fact.  It is typical rhetoric that liberal athiests spew.  

Do you know Jim Lee?  Do you have any information or experience with him to judge his faith?  Do you have anything that he has lied about or shown a false witness?  If so then please share it?  I guess if you did, you would have posted it the first time.  Go read the Huffington Post if you want more liberal propaganda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean, were you there?  If you were then you would realize the amount of people that showed up.  60-70000?  1.7 is definitely more like it.  It was an outstanding showing of Americans outraged at ridiculous government spending for things that gov&#8217;t has no business being a part of.  The focus of the rally was the government as a whole, and who is at the center of it right pushing for government run health care?  Obama.   </p>
<p>The Republicans in office for the 8 years prior did an awful job as well, they increased spending by a stupid amount, and now we are at the breaking point to where we are operating off of funny money.  It is time to replace them all and put people back in who will do their job to serve the people.</p>
<p>Your response to this post is also ridiculous in the fact that you haven&#8217;t posted a single fact.  It is typical rhetoric that liberal athiests spew.  </p>
<p>Do you know Jim Lee?  Do you have any information or experience with him to judge his faith?  Do you have anything that he has lied about or shown a false witness?  If so then please share it?  I guess if you did, you would have posted it the first time.  Go read the Huffington Post if you want more liberal propaganda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

