<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Did DHSG Drop Jeffrey&#8217;s Campaign?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theconservativist.com/2009/07/29/why-did-dhsg-drop-jefferys-campaign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theconservativist.com/2009/07/29/why-did-dhsg-drop-jefferys-campaign/</link>
	<description>The Upstate&#039;s Source for Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:42:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fort Liberty</title>
		<link>http://theconservativist.com/2009/07/29/why-did-dhsg-drop-jefferys-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-8339</link>
		<dc:creator>Fort Liberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theconservativist.com/?p=1826#comment-8339</guid>
		<description>Although I do not see Jim going too far or changing the dynamics of the race, he has the potential to stir up some issues and keep the people listening rather than tuning out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I do not see Jim going too far or changing the dynamics of the race, he has the potential to stir up some issues and keep the people listening rather than tuning out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: History of Patriots</title>
		<link>http://theconservativist.com/2009/07/29/why-did-dhsg-drop-jefferys-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-8338</link>
		<dc:creator>History of Patriots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theconservativist.com/?p=1826#comment-8338</guid>
		<description>There is one other candidate in the race...Jim Lee.  I would have to agree with you, and particularly about Jeffrey.

Jim Lee definitely has the potential to stir up the pot of overcooked politicians, similar to Demint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is one other candidate in the race&#8230;Jim Lee.  I would have to agree with you, and particularly about Jeffrey.</p>
<p>Jim Lee definitely has the potential to stir up the pot of overcooked politicians, similar to Demint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fort Liberty</title>
		<link>http://theconservativist.com/2009/07/29/why-did-dhsg-drop-jefferys-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-8337</link>
		<dc:creator>Fort Liberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theconservativist.com/?p=1826#comment-8337</guid>
		<description>Jeffrey gives me a headache every time she speaks. She answers all questions like a hybrid of a politician and a college professor (of which she is both)....talks too long, never gets to the point, and you learn nothing while wishing you had the last hour and a half back to do something better with your time. 

Thomas is chasing after a head horse. Enough said. 

Gowdy has been eerily silent. 

Inglis keeps trying to improve his &quot;Conservative&quot; image and I think that the people of the SC4 will actually fall for this guy again. (At least in the primary)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeffrey gives me a headache every time she speaks. She answers all questions like a hybrid of a politician and a college professor (of which she is both)&#8230;.talks too long, never gets to the point, and you learn nothing while wishing you had the last hour and a half back to do something better with your time. </p>
<p>Thomas is chasing after a head horse. Enough said. </p>
<p>Gowdy has been eerily silent. </p>
<p>Inglis keeps trying to improve his &#8220;Conservative&#8221; image and I think that the people of the SC4 will actually fall for this guy again. (At least in the primary)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron J</title>
		<link>http://theconservativist.com/2009/07/29/why-did-dhsg-drop-jefferys-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-8332</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theconservativist.com/?p=1826#comment-8332</guid>
		<description>Great article but the best/funniest thing is that only one Senator showed up at David Thomas hearing, himself.  Lol that is funny. I think he needs to let that go, it is done, and no one cares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article but the best/funniest thing is that only one Senator showed up at David Thomas hearing, himself.  Lol that is funny. I think he needs to let that go, it is done, and no one cares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Coats</title>
		<link>http://theconservativist.com/2009/07/29/why-did-dhsg-drop-jefferys-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-8330</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Coats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theconservativist.com/?p=1826#comment-8330</guid>
		<description>The point was that Inglis is not consistent.  Thomas will be campaigning in the middle of his legislative session for a higher office, so you would think Inglis&#039; logic would still apply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point was that Inglis is not consistent.  Thomas will be campaigning in the middle of his legislative session for a higher office, so you would think Inglis&#8217; logic would still apply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

